18262. More precisely: 50×(365 + ¼ - 1/128) = 18262.5 - 50/128 days (accurate to within 1/2 minute or less); but the calendar rounds down to18262 since 1968 and 2020 have the leap days in them.
18262年。更准确地说应该是:50×(365 +¼- 1/128)= 18262.5 - 50/128天(精确到半分钟内或更少)，但是从1968年到2020年的18262年的日历上有闰日。
@Berat Beyazkuş Mohammed? Are you talking about the moonwalk of Apollo 11? I was waiting for Michael to come up.
FLAT EARTH DATA
Fuhad Mohammed is that your argument? Is anyone able to provide scientific experiment proving that the second law thermodynamics doesn’t plan affect or does anybody have any footage that shows the transition between earths atmosphere into space ...Last I checked the Orion project could not lift a man 800 miles above earth...
FLAT EARTH DATA
@Fuhad Mohammed The earth isn't a spinning ball in infinite space. You are told the earth is spinning but can't feel it .. Last i checked there are two pulls .. on for earth spin and one for the orbit around the sun .. But no effect from that ... We are told rockets can travel in space but can't find any real evidence ..
FLAT EARTH DATA You can find any point on earth to the exact location with latitude and longitude coordinates. This is how satellites and gps equipment works. That’s proof in itself that the Earth is a sphere. It will cost about $3,000 but you can hop on commercial airliners and take a trip around the world, you can go due East/west/north/south, eventually you’ll be back where you started. Proof the earth is a sphere.
Do you think Jim Brewer can get the Dodgers to the World Series in' 70?
@Zombie Ep flat earth data is just here for the attention, people often enjoy arguing. (Including myself :P)
God of Pizza
Why is the quality so bad, it's like it was filmed on the moon :I
Some Wannabe youtuber
What do you think. This was filmed in 1969
they didn't have the bandwidth available to send back a full 525 line tv signal. it was something like 200 lines at 10 frames per second, and the process (in those days) of converting the low bandwidth signal to a regular tv signal caused additional loss of picture quality
killerjoker it’s the effects from the Hollywood movie cameras — so u really think it’s on the moon
Do you Think bro?
The actual film from the camera would have picture as clear as any movie in 69'. It is blurry to give an effect and to cover the camera tricks and props. With no atmosphere the picture should actually be clearer than on Earth with blinding stars!
Yup 1969 Neil Armstrong became the first man on the moon. It was telecasted Live On the 20th Of 1969 if I can remember.2
John Francis Doe
Chris Conversion was some guys in Australia filming a special TV! That's probably why the picture is upside down for a few seconds.
Legend has it that the original footage which has good quality was lost or deleted accidentally and so what we have now is a recording of the original recording.
May be right..bcz China say that America never went to the moon?
KIDS , ITS BECAUSE IT WAS RECORDED OFF OF A PROJECTOR SCREEN , LATER THE RECORDINGS WERE LOST . MUST BE BECAUSE THEY LANDED , OH WAIT NAH ITS BECAUSE THEY WERE TRYING TO HIDE SOMETHING , MAYBE THAT SOMETHING IS TV SET . OR STANLEY KUBRICK
The Openminded Skeptic
It's filmed of a TV-screen, which tells many people that they are trying to hide the details.
@Some Wannabe youtuber I am replying on your title! Life is very very difficult! Do you think, you are the only one that has problems?
我在回复你的标题! 人艰不拆! 你以为你是唯一有疑问的人吗?
Willem Van Spronsen
It was, and also it was 1969 and they didn’t understand computers and stuff like that
@Move Away And they are right. And you know why they told the truth ? Because they don't scare no one, any country. And they have nothing to win with NASA. I don't agree with their commercial policy but they have balls these Chinese.
Area 51 all moon walks. No space travel due to extreme radiation levels no human would survive.
True or not, this tells me it's a poorly run operation in need of new management, I am sure the same is true today!
This footage is horrible but the film of the moon itself is in perfect HD.
And with the famous lapsus linguae: he was meant to say "a small step for A man but a giant leap for mankind"... since saying "a small step for Man" transforms the line in an oxymoron! (I do remember noting it the first time heard it), and the anchorman then the commentators not picking up the mistake or at least the cryptic sense it involuntarily got. Only Walter Cronkite on CBS carefully noted: "I'm not sure I caught the second part of his sentence"... (!) Anyway, taking into account the high stress level of the moment, Neil Armstrong will be forgiven for his approximate rendition of an obviously PR-written ahead "historic phrase"...
他还说了一句名言:“一个人的一小步，却是人类的一大步。”既然说“一个人的一小步”就把这句话变成了矛盾修饰法! (我记得我第一次听的时候就注意到了）然后是主持人，然后是解说员，他们都没有意识到这个错误，或者至少是无意识地使其产生了一种神秘的感觉。只有沃尔特·克朗凯特(Walter Cronkite)在哥伦比亚广播公司(CBS)谨慎地指出:“我不确定我是否听清了他的第二部分……”。不管怎样，考虑到当时的高压状态，尼尔·阿姆斯特朗(Neil Armstrong)似乎演绎了一句显然是事先写好的“历史性短语”，这是可以被原谅的……
Jean Bonnefoy — Armstrong later said it was “... one small step for a man, ...”. I think it just got combined with “for” and not enunciated clearly, so it got lost. This is an example of why it best not to have a prepared remark for such a momentous occasion. He should have just said “I’m on the surface,” like any ordinary person would.
And just after that you can see the testing of the ground, they weren't sure how solid it would be, you see the safety strap for just in case he sunk into dust.
As a studio photographer for 40 plus years I have a problem with the lighting I'm seeing. It's much to localized , even on the lander itself, even with different reflective surfaces taken into consideration. Unless the vacuum of space wipes out shadows you should create when walking in front of the light source ( the sun) than something is wrong with this picture. The lighting should be much more consistent . It is certainly logical to question these abnormalities rather than obediently believe everything your told.
I’m not even American but this line always makes me so emotional
You’s think that Stanley Kubrick as the perfectionist he was would notice that fault.
Kittley Catty It is possible for the willing ,too bad humans are not brave enough to do it again in exchange for staying home and have a good time .
The automatic rollout camera on the lunar module. One of the reasons that Neil waited for so long is because he was waiting for the signal from control that the camera was ready.
A man has fallen into the river in Lego City
My father watched it live when he was 12
God of Pizza
Lucky man, to witness one of humanities greatest stepping stones for the future
God of Pizza and with Nasas next mission, we’ll be able to see them go to mars on national tv.
Silber Sterne I was 15 and I remember everything perfectly, I think everyone was glued to the tv filled with excitement. Right after they walked on the moon I ran outside, like many other kids, trying to spot them. I stood there in awe, thinking they were the 3 bravest men of our time.
i was 9 years old when i was up all night watching this. i also watched all moon shots. ask your father about the coke bottle i saw on the moon, he must have seen it too.
I watched with my husband and young children at a drive-in theater.. Some of us gathered around a TV set in the concession stand..
I have a sealed framed copy of the vancouver sun supplement, called The Moon, I saved it since 14.
wow, I think I was 3 years old when I watched this, I was 3 .what do you want?
I was 7 at the time...stayed up all night.. 1030pm to 1 am to watch...after seeing STAR TREK for the past year, the MOON WALK was extra impressive.. At 7, I wonder if I knew which was real at the time ;-)
Silber Sterne I was 14. My aunt lived in Parkes NSW Australia near the radio telescope which provided some of the footage.
I was 16, most all of the classrooms brought a TV in so we could watch, normal classwork was suspended. It was a very big and uniting event internationally as well.
@*-YOUR and YOU'RE are 2 different words-*
When I was a little kid (back in the Stone Age), we thought anyone over 25 was really ancient. Now I can only wonder how the heck I got to 72 and wish I were that ancient 25. Time flies when you are getting old and soon you too will get as "ancient" as he is now.
@OzoneGamerStation yeah, they walk around in a desert near Canada and claim that it is Mars.And sheeple like you will believe it.
I was 9, my parents woke up the three siblings in the wee hours to watch this live on our black and white television.
Well, no he didn't.. nobody watched it "live" as it was filmed off a TV screen from a feed that NASA provided
kim jong un
The moon landing was faked by Hollywood but they couldnt film it right, so they went to moon to film it.
Joseph A the fact that the flag isn’t moving actually gives more proof that it was filmed on the moon than the earth, idiot
@INDIGO T.V. ima tell you again, the stars are billions of miles away. Another reason is that there is still sun light.
Markel Andrews but any time you go to space you will see stars ask Russians Chinese people they went to space before us and Russia even said the radiation is to dangerous for man kind
kim jong un
@Unknown A since the moon has little to no atmosphere it doesnt move, but they put some little poles into it to make it stay (since it kept falling),
@INDIGO T.V. Washed out by the light of a star called The Sun buddy. While the sky might be black all of the lunar missions took place during lunar daytime, as a lunar day is about two weeks long even the multi-day missions were always in daylight. Even if you get the sun out of your line of sight you still have the unfiltered sunlight reflecting off the lunar surface, it was difficult to block out enough light to see stars but Gene Cernan claimed he did it. I believe he had to stand in the shadow of the LM, raise his visor and take some other measures to do it though. Bringing a camera into the mix didn't help, especially since those cameras were set to photograph the moon and not the stars in the sky. You don't have to go to the moon to get pictures of stars so that's not what they were even attempting to do. At roughly 240 thousand miles distance it's not a journey long enough to cause an appreciable change in the starfield or any difference in the individual stars themselves as the nearest is still over 4 light years away or roughly 24 trillion miles. So it wasn't just difficult to photograph the stars from the lunar surface but also completely pointless.
Markel Andrews the stars are in the Firmsment and it's not thousands of miles away.
@INDIGO T.V. the camera that they used filtered out the light from the stars ect so they could show a better picture from the moon otherwise you would have got a lot of glare
@INDIGO T.V. They lowered the exposure on the camera, the reflected sunlight would be blinding to a normal exposure.
The stars were lost in the backdrop due to high contrast between the dull backdrop and the bright surface. Ever tried to drive directly facing the sun? Or taken a photo directly facing a bright light?
@Markel Andrews Stars are "billions" of miles away? LOL, And yet we can see stars from earth, but not on the moon? Lies never make sense
@Talksense The earth is not facing the sun at night, which allows us to see the stars. At space, we can't see the stars because our sunlight is too bright. Learn some basic science before you comment
@Alex davidson because it's expensive and dangerous. Not to mention how long it will take to travel to mars
Willem Van Spronsen
Actually, Apollo 11 was one of many missions in the Apollo program, and they did it for the science and exploration
Willem Van Spronsen
Because the flag was tied to the pole and the moon doesn’t have any wind, so the flag was firmly in place.
@Susan Bones so how was it possible that the astronomy is completely wrong
@INDIGO T.V. You can never see stars easily while in space. If you look at SpaceX Camera that is in space they cant see stars at all. they see apple on earth tho.
Where's Micheal Jackson? I can't find him. Also I don't see anyone moonwalk.
Too be honest it’s better than those shaky 2001 videos of 9/11, makes you wonder what the worlds governments are hiding, especially the USA.
Oh, the footage supposedly shot on the moon is of exponentially better quality than security cameras at the freaking Pentagon in 2001? Seems legit. The Pentagon was hit by a missile. I know people who were driving by in an ambulance when it happened and were mysteriously stopped from responding in an unsolicited manner until everything was “ready”. “Lights, camera, ACTION!”: The US government’s favorite line!
Reality is that the first footage was being received in Australia and they were getting clear color imaging. To televise it they focussed a B/W TV camera at the monitor and that is what everyone saw. They weren't recording directly from the monitor so we only have this grainy ABC TV footage.
how do you know what tech they had in secret back in the day. It's been noted that the tech they had back then was better than we have been told about and higher tech than we are using today.
I find this to be interesting Jarp, jurp jup jup
it looks like footage taken by a black and white camera from a cellphone from 1940. This looks like it happened early WW2, even the narrator sounds like someone from the 40's. "TOP SECRET GOVERNMENT INFORMATION.... Brought to you by Marlboro for the public cinema..." "This is the moon... its grey... its a rock, but you might want to take some of this information with a grain of salt"
@Martin Dean if you think footage of 9/11 is bad, you must have missed the over 60 recorded angles of it, earlier available on YouTube
添加公众号 樱落网 点击菜单栏直接访问